🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked the legislature to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these services, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," commented one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.